- Two mechanical engineers at North Carolina State University propose a radical theory that suggests fragments of energy, rather than particles or waves, are the fundamental building blocks of the universe.
- They envision energy as flowing through space and time in the form of lines that don’t intersect, forming the basis of their theory.
- The historical journey of understanding matter from Aristotle’s elements to particles and waves is highlighted, emphasizing the interconnectedness of particles and waves in the early 20th century.
- The engineers introduce the concept of a “fragment of energy,” a building block that combines the characteristics of particles and waves, suggesting a new way to understand the universe.
- They develop equations based on their theory and apply it to two problems solved by Einstein’s theory of general relativity, successfully replicating the outcomes.
Embracing a paradigm shift, two mechanical engineers from North Carolina State University, Larry Silverberg and Jeffrey Eischen, have introduced a groundbreaking theory that challenges our conventional understanding of the universe.
Instead of viewing the fundamental components of the cosmos as particles or waves, they propose that fragments of energy, akin to lines of flowing energy, serve as the building blocks of the universe.
Central to their theory is the concept that energy is perpetually in motion, flowing through the dimensions of space and time. These lines of energy neither intersect nor possess a distinct starting or ending point.
The engineers sought to establish a single, all-encompassing building block for this continuous flow of energy, envisioning it as a fundamental element for predicting the universe’s behavior at both cosmic and microscopic scales.
This shift in perspective brings to mind the historical journey of understanding matter. Aristotle’s ancient theory posited that the universe was composed of five elements: earth, water, air, fire, and the celestial aether. This concept endured for over two millennia and hampered countless alchemists in their quest to transform earthly materials into gold.
However, the 17th-century alchemist Robert Boyle, often hailed as the “father” of modern chemistry, revolutionized this belief by proposing that all matter consisted of particles. This idea spurred a transformative era in science, culminating in Sir Isaac Newton’s formulation of classical mechanics.
The reigning theory for 150 years, particles and waves served as the bedrock of matter. Particles were regarded as the individual building blocks, representing matter concentrated at a single point in space. Waves, on the other hand, acted as the energetic mortar binding these particles, dissipating throughout space.
Nevertheless, the early 20th century revealed a surprising twist. The famous double-slit experiment demonstrated that the distinction between particles and waves was not as clear-cut as previously assumed. Particles occasionally exhibited wave-like behavior, and even light, typically perceived as waves, could at times behave like particles.
Simultaneously, Albert Einstein was formulating his theory of general relativity, linking the curvature of space and time to the force of gravity. Despite these groundbreaking discoveries, the precise connections between particles, waves, and general relativity remained enigmatic.
Silverberg and Eischen’s innovative approach introduces a novel building block that fuses the characteristics of both particles and waves: the “fragment of energy.” This fragment resembles the stars in a distant galaxy – from a distance, it appears as a radiant glow spreading outward, but upon closer examination, individual components become discernible. Similarly, the fragment of energy concentrates and flows outward, departing from a central point.
Armed with this new building block, the engineers formulated a set of equations for solving physics problems and tested their theory against two problems originally addressed by Einstein over a century ago.
By modeling the sun as a massive fragment of energy and Mercury as a smaller fragment orbiting it, they successfully solved the issue of Mercury’s orbital shift caused by the sun’s gravitational pull. In the second problem concerning the bending of light as it traverses warped space and time near the sun, their approach mirrored Einstein’s predictions.
While their theory may not entirely redefine physics like Maxwell’s introduction of electromagnetic waves or Einstein’s general relativity, it promises a more intuitive comprehension of the wave-particle duality of matter. It presents a fresh perspective on understanding the universe, leaving room for exciting possibilities in the field of theoretical physics.